SEEP Logo





Books on Southeast Europe

Amazon.com

Order a FREE Subscription to SEEP
 

Send us your comments on this article

 

Back to the main page

Southeast European Politics Online


Serbia's Bulldozer Revolution: Conditions and Prospects


ERIC D. GORDY
Clark University / Collegium Budapest
 
  Download complete article in PDF

The change of regime in Serbia in October came as a surprise to most people both inside and outside the country. Although surveys in the months before the election were fairly consistent in suggesting that the opposition would win at least a plurality, this was by no means universally accepted as a prediction of the future. In the first place, voter surveys of this type are notoriously unreliable when they are carried out in environments where answers are heavily consequential and might not be given freely, like Milosevic's Serbia. In the second place, experience from previous elections persuasively suggested that there was no reason to expect that the results would be consistent with the way people voted. In the third place, there was no confidence that Milosevic would recognize the results of an election he did not win. So in the two months leading up to the election, it was the consensus in reports by several international governments and monitoring agencies that no great changes ought to be expected from the elections which took place on 24 September.
           I can also count myself among the people who were surprised. Of the visits I have made to Belgrade over the past ten years, the one I made in the summer of 2000 (I left the day before the elections were called) was the most depressing and dispiriting so far. The political opposition, which had achieved a measure of unity earlier in the year, divided again after another conflict between SPO and the rest of the opposition parties. The regime was making extensive use of repressive laws on media and university regulation which had been forced through during the "state of emergency" over Kosovo in 1998, and was prepared to put through a new "law against terrorism" which defined terrorism extremely broadly. With the takeover of Studio B and Radio B92 in May, and the constant jamming of Radio Index, there were no independent electronic media available in the city. The signs of what appeared the success of the regime in the destruction of alternatives seemed to be reflected in the cultural scene as well. People I knew who had been actively engaged in various kinds of antiwar and antiregime activities had withdrawn. Among the few new offerings of independent rock 'n roll music available was an album by the group Jarboli with the single track "Revolucija," which featured the chorus "u nama je zauvek umrla" (it has died in us forever). One factor which provided a consistent contrast to this was the student resistance organization "Otpor!," whose members continued to produce clever and pointed materials and public manifestations despite harassment which included the arrest of over a thousand of their members in the period between May and August. Nonetheless it was hard to find exceptions to a general atmosphere of hopelessness and defeat, and the sense that the regime could very well travel a long distance further on the power of inertia.
           
By now I think everybody here knows what happened in the meantime. Elections were held on 24 September, with the opposition coalition DOS (Demokratska opozicija Srbije) gaining a convincing majority of votes. The regime attempted by a variety of means to falsify the results, to prevent their publication, to force a second round, and finally, in a Supreme Court decision on 4 October, to nullify the election. The following day protesters from around Serbia converged on Belgrade, and by the end of the day they had taken over the federal Parliament and the state television, and had faced down threats of intervention by the military and the police. One action--the breaking of the police cordon around the state television headquarters by a driver using heavy construction equipment--gave the events a name: the "Bulldozer revolution." Within a week they had at least nominal control over most civilian centers of power and secured the exit from power of Slobodan Milosevic.

           
The questions I want to ask now are general ones. First, what happened to make the opposition finally come together in October of this year? And second, to what extent is the change of regime a real historical break with the Milosevic regime? I want to ask, that is, why did the "bulldozer revolution" happen, and did it matter?

Download complete article in PDF

line

Southeast European Politics
Department of Political Science, Central European University
Nador U. 9, Budapest 1051, Hungary
Email: editor@seep.ceu.hu 
Fax: (36-1) 327 3087

line

© SEEP, 1999-2000.
Last Update: December, 2000.